Case one:
-In terms of democratic stand poind, majority's opinion would be inclined to take side of federal government that challenge the Arizona's new law.
-When ignorance comes into effect, people would disagree with Arizona Immigration Law. What is ignorace??? What I mean by ignorance is that racism or hatred against certain groups of people.
Can you combine these two above?? What can you guess a person with these two ideas or thoughts would say about Obama's challenge to the Arizona law??
Case two:
-Serious illigal immigrant workers do not commit crime and are making contribution for the life of rich American. so.. lets say California needs illegal immigrants.
-illegal immigrants are cause of increasing crime rate, because police says that illegal immigrants are related to most kidnapping or other crimes.
Can you make a easy decision based on these two above?? Do you regard the former as an important or a latter?? Actually, both are significant.
It would be much easier for people to not think about immigration issue from perspectives of economic, democratic, social, America's multi-ethnic aspect. I would be easier if people can just think the issue of Arizona as a controversy between federal government and Arizona state government. Acutally, government is the one that makes decision; in other words, government is the one that makes solution regardless of how many people agree and disagree.
So.. what is the point of demos against Arizona immigration law?? or what is the point of people who oppose or agree with the law issue?? and getting mad about the issue??
What can you think of as the best solution to this issue?? or what is at the end of this debate over immigration issue??
we do have power to alter the decisions that are made for us we decide who gets voted into office we send letters to our representatives and in terms of california they directly vote on propositions like that
ReplyDeletewhat's wrong with these americans? or shoud I say- where's wrong with the AMERICA??
ReplyDeleteEven though Congress may enact naturalization legislation, however, and even if this power is exclusively federal, states are not necessarily barred from regulating illegal immigration.
ReplyDeleteEven if a court somehow determined that the statute created some kind of racial classification, the statute still would not necessarily be unconstitutional.
ReplyDeleteLee, he thinks “it humiliates us in the eyes of America and threatens our economic recovery.” More than 50,000 people signed petitions opposing SB 1070 and 2,500 students from high schools across Phoenix walked out of school !!!
ReplyDelete